Sunday, April 26, 2009

FROM SMOKING BAN TO SMOKERS BAN: WELCOME TO 2009

FROM SMOKING BAN TO SMOKERS BAN: WELCOME TO 2009

WWW, March 2009 - One could have waited for this: the anti-smokers lobby found a new toy and it is called "Third Hand Smoke". In their ever-lasting crusade against smokers, the freedom-haters have succesfully created the first place where there is not just a smoking ban, but rather a smokers ban.

image


The sign (see picture) is very clear: not only does it say that smokers are not allowed, the smoker has de facto become a second class citizen much like the Jews in Nazi Germany were first banned from all kinds of public places, only to be taken into concentration camps. "In the interest of others", Jews were banned. After all, their mere presence was considered to be a danger for the public health et cetera.

Fast forward to 2009. For a number of years, the smoking ban (which was introduced during Hitler's reign as well) has been introduced in just about every public place. In the name of "public health", and equiped with fables surrounding "Second Hand Smoke", the freedom-haters and health fetishists who could for the most part not tell you where they are living for themselves, have killed a number of cultural activities. In-door Reggae Concerts? No smoking. A Country Pub where the locals take a drink and a smoke? No longer possible.

Unfortunately for the freedom-haters, a mere smoking ban does not kill the pleasure of life that smoking is for many people. After all, smokers go outside, stick together, and have a good time outside. This is unacceptable for the health fetishists but they were still facing the fact that humans have human rights.

They needed to come up with a new idea, to go beyond the smoking ban, and now they found it in a new fable called "Third Hand Smoke" (THS). THS proponents claims, that smokers carry toxic gasses with them, in their clothing, in their breathing, in their bodies. The consequence of this theory is just what the freedom-haters want: the mere presence of a smoker in a room may cause death for the "others", and so, these "others" have to be "protected" from the mere presence of a smoker.

The Royal Oldham Hospital (UK) is the first place where the myth of THS is being elevated to Bible Truth. The hospital has created a room where there is not just a smoking ban, but a smokers ban. The reasoning behind it, even though in itself fraudulent, has led the hospital to divide humanity into two species. After all, when the mere presence of one category of humans is considered a danger for "public health" (whatever that may mean, by the way) for "the others", we see that humans themselves are being seen as inferior to claims and theories.

Smokers and non-smokers who respect the humanity of their fellow (wo)men, should be alarmed by this disturbing development. It's not just the myth and lie that is THS, it is the dividing of humanity into super and sub species.

More info:
http://www.pr-inside.com/smokers-not-just-smoking-barred-at-r1140158.htm
http://fightantismokertyranny.blogspot.com/2009/03/no-smokers-allowed-at-royal-oldham.html

Obama Administration Takes First Steps Towards THE DRAFT

Obama Administration Takes First Steps Towards THE DRAFT

WWW, March 2008 - It's one of the strongest ways for the state to imprison their youths: Conscription or the Draft. That's right, Obama is running out of soldiers and by the way, he needs to build up his civilian Stasi-style "civilian corps" and he's not looking for volunteers!

Of course, the US army isn't a voluntarily army at all. Just look at the recruits, who join the military because they simply have no other perspective in life.But still, the illusion was there. This illusion is no longer neccesary with Obama. Although he is quickly running out of the support he got when he was selected as President of the USA, he is now in the position to simply demand the support he needs to build the Police State on a yet deeper level than his predecessor could do.

He running to it, quick.

As PrisonPlanet's Steve Watson concludes, the Americanm parliament has recently approved the first step to conscription.




House Passes Mandatory National Service Bill

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, March 19, 2009

House Passes Mandatory National Service Bill 190309top

The House passed a bill yesterday which includes disturbing language indicating young people will be forced to undertake mandatory national service programs as fears about President Barack Obama's promised "civilian national security force" intensify.

The Generations Invigorating Volunteerism and Education Act, known as the GIVE Act, was passed yesterday by a 321-105 margin and now goes to the Senate.

Under section 6104 of the bill, entitled "Duties," in subsection B6, the legislation states that a commission will be set up to investigate, "Whether a workable, fair, and reasonable mandatory service requirement for all able young people could be developed, and how such a requirement could be implemented in a manner that would strengthen the social fabric of the Nation and overcome civic challenges by bringing together people from diverse economic, ethnic, and educational backgrounds."

Section 120 of the bill also discusses the "Youth Engagement Zone Program" and states that "service learning" will be "a mandatory part of the curriculum in all of the secondary schools served by the local educational agency."

"The legislation, slated to cost $6 billion over five years, would create 175,000 "new service opportunities" under AmeriCorps, bringing the number of participants in the national volunteer program to 250,000. It would also create additional "corps" to expand the reach of volunteerism into new sectors, including a Clean Energy Corps, Education Corps, Healthy Futures Corps and Veterans Service Corps, and it expands the National Civilian Community Corps to focus on additional areas like disaster relief and energy conservation," reports Fox News.

The Senate is also considering a similar piece of legislation known as the "Serve America Act," which also includes language about "Youth Engagement Zones".

Fears about Obama's plans to create involuntary servitude were first stoked in July 2008, when Obama told a rally in Colorado Springs, "We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that is just as powerful, just as strong, just as well funded."

Despite denials that Obama plans to institute a mandatory program of national service, his original change.gov website stated that Americans would be "required" to complete "50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year". The text was only later changed to state that Americans would be "encouraged" to undertake such programs.

In addition, Obama's Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, publicly stated his intention to help create "universal civil defense training" in 2006.

"The bill's opponents - and there are only a few in Congress - say it could cram ideology down the throats of young "volunteers," many of whom could be forced into service since the bill creates a "Congressional Commission on Civic Service," reports Fox.

"We contribute our time and money under no government coercion on a scale the rest of the world doesn't emulate and probably can't imagine," said Luke Sheahan, contributing editor for the Family Security Foundation. "The idea that government should order its people to perform acts of charity is contrary to the idea of charity and it removes the responsibility for charity from the people to the government, destroying private initiative."

Lee Cary of the conservative American Thinker warns that Obama's agenda is to, "tap into the already active volunteerism of millions of Americans and recruit them to become cogs in a gigantic government machine grinding out his social re-engineering agenda."

CFR luminary Gary Hart hit back at critics, claiming in a Huffington Post piece that, "Resistance to expanded public service programs can be expected from the ideologically sclerotic, those who occupy the negative ground between government as the problem and government as our enemy."

ORIGINAL URL

OBAMA LAUGHS AWAY SUGGESTIONS OF LEGALIZATION AND RIDICULES PROPONENTS!

OBAMA LAUGHS AWAY SUGGESTIONS OF LEGALIZATION AND RIDICULES PROPONENTS!

WWW, March 2009 - In what should be seen as another reason for Reggae artists not to worship the president of America as if the man is Jah Rastafari, Barack Obama recently answered a question from an Internet audience about the legalization of ganja. He was extremely amused by the idea of legalization, and even ridiculed the people who proposed it.


The question was posed as part of an "Internet Town Hall Meeting", in which Barack Obama answered questions by an online audience. Before answering with a big fat NO, Obama admitted that the question was "fairly high on the list" and that therefore he had to answer it. Obama's reluctance in answering the question could very well have to do with the fact that so many people, including many who call themselves Rastafarians, think and claim that Obama is for legalization of ganja, one reason for many to have voted for him.

A few years ago, Obama was recorded as saying that he was for de-criminalizing ganja, but not legalization. In answering the question for the online audience this month, he even didn't hint to decriminalizing and instead turned to laughter and riducule. Backed up by a group who couldn't stop laughing either about what they obviously saw as a ridiculous proposal, Obama said that the question said something about the "online audience rather then about the proposal itself.

Apart from the fact that it is highly inapropriate to laugh about this matter, for there are hundreds of thousands if not millions of people in the American prisons just for posession of a few grams of herb, Obama's ridiculizing of proponents of legalization should at least wake up a few people who have been blinded by what Hip Hop artist KRS-ONE calls "Black Face On The New World Order".

Latest Publications From The Babylon Observer Forum

DISCLAIMER

In case the article(s) on this page was quoted from another source, the two following statements apply:
-1- Fair Use policy applies since the quote is for non-profit educational and research purposes only. For more information, go to: http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html
-2- The Babylon Observer has no affiliation whatsoever with the originator of the articles nor is The Babylon Observer endorsed or sponsored by the originator.